Tories Storm out of Meeting on Energy Sharing As reported by CanWest in the Ottawa Citizen, Edmonton Journal and Montreal Gazette today, "Amid heated charges of a coverup, Tory MPs on Thursday abruptly shut down parliamentary hearings on a controversial plan to further integrate Canada and the U.S. The firestorm erupted within minutes of testimony by University of Alberta professor Gordon Laxer that Canadians will be left 'to freeze in the dark' if the government forges ahead with plans to integrate energy supplies across North America." Gordon is a Council board member and was presenting to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on International Trade yesterday in his capacity as Director of Calgary's Parkland Institute. The trade committee has been holding hearings on the Security and Prosperity Partnership since last week, when Maude Barlow presented on the threat of bulk water exports presented by closer integration. You can read her comments on the Council's website here: www.canadians.org/DI/documents/trade_committee_presentation_May107.pdf. Gordon's presentation is also available on our website here: www.canadians.org/DI/documents/Trade_Gordon_Laxer_1007.pdf. The Conservative chair of the trade committee, Leon Benoit, suddenly "ordered Laxer to halt his testimony, saying it was not relevant," wrote the CanWest story today. Then "opposition MPs called for, and won, a vote to overrule Benoit's ruling." But Benoit declared, "This meeting is adjourned," and stormed out with three of the four other Conservative MPs. According to the article, "Benoit's actions are virtually unprecedented, observers say; at press time, parliamentary procedure experts still hadn't figured out whether he had the right to adjourn the meeting unilaterally. Benoit did not respond to calls for comment." And NDP MP Peter Julian, who arranged the SPP hearings in the first place, wondered aloud whether the government was purposely trying to silence debate on the issue of energy and the SPP. As Maude Barlow wrote in the Calgary Herald last November, "This agreement (the SPP) is the real motivation behind the Conservative government's position on climate change. Their so-called 'made in Canada' strategy is made for the U.S. Energy integration is a key element of the deep integration agenda enshrined in the SPP and signed by Canada, the U.S. and Mexico in March 2005." Thanks, Stuart (Brent is away today) Tory MPs storm out of meeting on energy sharing; Canada left short to aid U.S., says professor The Edmonton Journal (A6) The Ottawa Citizen (A3) The Montreal Gazette (A12) Fri 11 May 2007 Section: News Dateline: OTTAWA Source: Ottawa Citizen; CanWest News Service OTTAWA - Amid heated charges of a coverup, Tory MPs on Thursday abruptly shut down parliamentary hearings on a controversial plan to further integrate Canada and the U.S. The firestorm erupted within minutes of testimony by University of Alberta professor Gordon Laxer that Canadians will be left "to freeze in the dark" if the government forges ahead with plans to integrate energy supplies across North America. He was testifying on behalf of the Alberta-based Parkland Institute about concerns with the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), a 2005 accord by the U.S., Canada and Mexico to streamline economic and security rules across the continent. The deal, which calls North American "energy security" a priority, commits Canada to ensuring American energy supplies even though Canada itself -- unlike most industrialized nations -- has no national plan or reserves to protect its own supplies, he argued. At that point, Tory MP Leon Benoit, chair of the Commons Standing Committee on International Trade which was holding the SPP hearings, ordered Laxer to halt his testimony, saying it was not relevant. Opposition MPs called for, and won, a vote to overrule Benoit's ruling. Benoit then threw down his pen, declaring, "This meeting is adjourned," and stormed out, followed by three of the panel's four Conservative members. The remaining members voted to finish the meeting, with the Liberal vice-chair presiding. Benoit's actions are virtually unprecedented, observers say; at press time, parliamentary procedure experts still hadn't figured out whether he had the right to adjourn the meeting unilaterally. Benoit did not respond to calls for comment. It's "reckless and irresponsible" of the government not to discuss protecting Canada's energy supply, says Laxer. Atlantic Canada and Quebec already have to import 90 per cent of their supply -- 45 per cent of it from potentially unstable sources such as Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Algeria, Laxer said. Meanwhile, Canada is exporting 63 per cent of its oil and 56 per cent of its gas production, mostly to the U.S., he says. "It's shocking the extent to which the Conservative party will go to cover up information about the SPP," says NDP MP Peter Julian, who also sits on the committee. Other MPs raised concerns about recently revealed plans under the SPP to raise Canadian limits on pesticide residues to match American rules. Questions were also raised about whether the effort will open the door to bulk water exports. Representatives from the departments of Industry and International Trade defended the SPP as an effort to protect Canadian jobs in a competitive global market, without sacrificing standards. They denied charges SPP negotiations have been secretive, saying civil-society groups are welcome to offer their input, and referred MPs to the government website. These messages are distributed by the Vancouver-Burnaby Chapter of the Council of Canadians.